2023-10-18
| improvements |
|---|
| I feel that the data could have been simplified and broken down a bit more. It requires a lot of reading of the figure legend to work out what the data is showing and is not as easily read. There is a lot of figures crammed into the one area so the data could have been separatd a bit more to make it less overwhelming to read. |
| improvements |
|---|
| It felt a bit cluttered and hard to read, I’d space out the figure legend a bit more to be more specific than cluster 2A, 2B together to make it clear what section means what and for figure 2F use a line of best fit to help declutter all the points. |
| F is a little crowded and the significance indication is very similar to data points, so could be confusing. |
| Scatter plots could be clearer |
| improvements |
|---|
| less busy would be best as its overwhelmin gin figure E and F |
| Not sure why they used two different colour schemes for representing March and February in figure D - perhaps just use the same one. |
| more straightforward |
| more text description of 3C and change colours in3D |
| improvements |
|---|
| The figure looks cluttered and could have been better presented in transparent boxes to differentiate the data types being shown. |
| Using more than one type of data representation, and making sure that data is easier to distinguish. Maybe even combining some to allow for easy comparison. |
| Can change to another type of data visualisation such as Box and Whisker Plot |
| improvements |
|---|
| // |
| Try to simplify it and make it more clear |
| adjust scales |
| Better scaling of graphs. More succinct and clear figure legend which pertains to the data presented. |
| Pair box plots with scatter plots will help the reader understand the distribution of the data points better |
| improvements |
|---|
| each section is quite busy-looking, maybe spreading them out and making the labels a bit more simple |
| include each generation in C for consistency |
| improvements |
|---|
| Better colour selection, less colours where unneccessary, more whitespace |
| use slightly brighter colours, the dull colours look similar and its difficult to decern them |
| Make it more spaces and change to a better visualisation type such as bar chart which is clearer. |
| simpflify it |
| Graphs could have been made larger to make it easier to read the data points and results. Words were blurred due to being too small. |
| Use more appropriate colour/pattern scheme. |
| improvements |
|---|
| make some of the figures bigger as they are a little small and i have to zoom to see them better |
| Not sure. |
| Looks a bit cluttered, not very eye-catching so maybe space it out a bit and add better colour |
| improvements |
|---|
| Figure E’s error bars have a weird colour that makes them look faded and hard to look at |
| Maybe use more contrasting colours |
| F and G were difficult to understand/visualise. Text was rather small and difficult to read. Requires the reader to look between the figure legend and data to understand it is showing. The colours were also not extremely clear making it difficult to see clear groups. Figure E was particularly difficult to interpret due to a blurred effect of the colours used in the graph. |
| Better labelling of graphs with age groups, error bars on bar graphs, more breakdown of complicated data into readable graphs, more detailed figure legend. |
| improvements |
|---|
| Layout figure A and B better |